At Defcon XIV, Immunity trotted out the first iteration of their NOP cert test, and I had the pleasure of giving it a test run. I still think it's a great indicator of ability, despite the Immunity tools focus; I'm not a user of any of their tools generally, but I managed to pull off the hardest level test in a modest time. It got us thinking on the way home, where does one go from the bar set by the NOP to get to the next level in terms of exploit development skill? In this vein I've thrown together a few windows executables, and in a nod to Gera of Core, they're called Advanced Windows Buffer Overflows (AWBOs).
Standard tools used are cygwin with perl, and windbg, installation in vmware a plus. The shellcode provided is the amazing windows exec shellcode from metasploit set up to run calc.exe.
I can say that all of these are exploitable, and they run through a progression, so try to do each of them in the most straight forward way possible. We'll be skipping awbo1.exe as it's very similar to one of immunity's tests (as far as my memory serves). They'll be released slowly over the next few months. Feel free to send in your solutions, or ask for tips. All of the examples have been play tested by the Talos analysts team, and are assured to be exploitable.
This time around you'll find a solution under Windows 2000 SP4, then you'll find a solution for Windows XPSP2.
This one might remind you of a certain back orifice parsing vulnerability you may be familiar with. It was asserted that this one couldn't be done in XPSP2, only in Win2k, but it really depends on how cl orders the stack before tossing the cookie in. Later, you'll get a chance to work on this with a mocked up stack cookie (awbo6) so keep that in mind here. For now though, lets stick to Win2k. The same rules apply here: no NOP sleds, no static stack return addresses.
I really like this one. It'll be different than the last few, and might involve a bit of a brain stretch for those not familiar with exploit techniques that differ from the norm. It'll hurt. There's a bit of basic reversing, but that's not the problem.